The Tata Harrier EV is a heavy SUV, and its weight shows when pushed. On the track, the bulk becomes clear, and it doesn’t feel fully confident or composed.
By Karan Mathur

The Tata Harrier EV was one of the most anticipated contenders in this year’s track day lineup. It scored impressively in categories that matter most for a family SUV – 4/5 for comfort and space, 4/5 for design, and that to, at a really good value. It looks and feels a class above, and the all-wheel-drive system – called ‘quad-wheel drive’ by Tata – adds a promise of go-anywhere capability to this luxurious and tech-laden SUV. Inside, the cabin wows with a stunning 14.53-inch screen, premium dual-tone finishes, and a thoughtfully laid-out interior that left a strong impression on the jury.
Also Read: Tata Harrier.ev First Drive Review - Homegrown Wattage
Performance, however, is where things become complicated. You see, on paper, the QWD version is a beast, with 504Nm of torque and a claimed 0 – 100 km/h sprint time of 6.3 seconds. Off the line, its acceleration is thrilling and intoxicating, while the AWD system ensures that power is delivered cleanly. But on the track, all this disappeared like smoke. It clocked a lap time of 1:14.1 – one of the slowest on the list. The reason? Well, it’s simple – the weight.
The Harrier EV is a big, heavy SUV, and you feel every kilogram the moment you push it hard. On the track, its bulk becomes apparent, and it doesn’t feel confident or composed. Moreover, its soft brakes, vague steering, and top-heavy feel make things difficult around tight corners. The Harrier struggles to use all that power to its advantage, for the chassis simply can’t keep up under stress – it tends to get overwhelmed by the weight. The Harrier EV’s low scores for performance and handling reflect this reality. In short, this isn’t a performance SUV despite what its spec sheet might suggest.
Also Read: Mahindra XEV 9e vs Hyundai Creta EV vs Tata Harrier.ev Comparison - Circuit Breaker
That said, the Harrier EV is a supremely comfortable, high-tech, and spacious long-distance cruiser. Its premium cabin and phenomenal ride quality make it a fantastic place to be in for long journeys. It impressed the jury with its ambition and luxury, but it’s not a car to chase apexes in – it’s more suited for those who like to cruise on the highway in absolute comfort.
| PARAMETERS | POINTS | SCORE |
|---|---|---|
| QUALITY | 5 | 3 |
| COMFORT / SPACE | 5 | 4 |
| REFINEMENT | 5 | 3.5 |
| DESIGN | 5 | 4 |
| DRIVETRAIN | 5 | 4 |
| RIDE & HANDLING | 5 | 3 |
| PRACTICALITY | 5 | 3.5 |
| X FACTOR | 20 | 10 |
| LAP TIME | 15 | 3.2 |
| VALUE FOR MONEY | 30 | 15 |
| TOTAL | 100 | 53.2 |