Found 1 Toyota dealer showrooms in Kumbakonam including their address and contact details.

<div id='div-gpt-ad-1685987668152-0' style='min-width: 300px; min-height: 250px;'>
  <script>
    googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1685987668152-0'); });
  </script>
</div>

<div id='div-gpt-ad-1685987583233-0' style='min-width: 300px; min-height: 250px;'>
  <script>
    googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1685987583233-0'); });
  </script>
</div>

Toyota Ebella Range Test - Here’s What We Actually Got | autoX

TVS Apache, Ronin ROK Editions Unveiled – Here's What's New

SMK Helmets Expands India Line-up with Nova Series

Goa Aces JA Racing Win Round 4 of Indian Racing League

Jeep Meridian Track Edition Launched in India at Rs 35.95 Lakh

Mahindra XEV 9S vs Kia Carens Clavis EV - Fam Jam

<p>
    Want a three-row electric SUV under Rs 30 lakh? Get yourself a Mahindra XEV 9S. Case closed.</p>

<p>But… if you’re not obsessed with having an SUV and want a truly capable three-row electric family car, you should take a look at the Kia Carens Clavis EV before writing that cheque to your local Mahindra dealer. The Clavis EV offers comparable real-world performance, a similar set of usable features, and is, in fact, more spacious and more affordable. But is it a better bet than the XEV 9S in the larger scheme of things? Time to find out.</p>

<h2>Design &amp; Dimensions: SUV vs MPV Practicality Compared</h2>

<p>Let’s start with design. The Mahindra is an SUV, while the Kia is an MPV, and honestly, there’s no comparison if all you want is road presence. The 9S is big, burly, and in-your-face. You see it in your rear-view mirror, you’re probably moving aside.</p><p>That said, when you see the Clavis EV in your ORVM, you might mistake it for an SUV, too. Its upright, muscular, and aggressive front end, combined with a sleek LED DRL strip, gives it a surprisingly tough face.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra-XEV-9S-vs-Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-1-1770705764294.webp" alt="Mahindra XEV 9S vs Kia Carens Clavis EV-1.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p>







<p>Walk around to the side, though, and its MPV proportions become obvious. It’s lower and longer, and it rides on smaller 17-inch wheels (vs 18-inch). The rear tells the same story. The Kia’s design is clean and modern, but nowhere near as butch as the XEV. The Mahindra is longer, wider, and taller, too.</p><p>If you want to make a bold statement with your seven-seat EV, the XEV is the default choice. If you prefer something more subtle yet contemporary, the Clavis EV fits the bill.</p>







<h2>Battery Options, Range, Performance &amp; Charging Comparison</h2>

<p>Before we get to our tests, let’s talk numbers. The Mahindra offers three battery options: 59kWh, 70kWh, and 79kWh. The Kia gets two – 42kWh and 51.4kWh. On capacity alone, the Mahindra has a clear advantage. However, the Kia uses NMC battery chemistry, while the XEV uses LFP cells. This chemistry gives the Clavis EV a higher energy density and a more compact battery pack.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_1-1771225767591.webp" alt="Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_1.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Claimed ranges for the Mahindra are 521km, 600km, and 679km, depending on the pack. The Kia offers 404km with the smaller battery and 490km with the larger one. The Mahindra also supports up to 180kW DC fast charging, while the Kia supports up to 100kW. Realistically, that’s not a major disadvantage for the Kia, since 100kW+ chargers are still relatively rare even in major metro cities.</p>







<p>Performance is where the XEV stretches its legs. The 79kWh version on test produces 282bhp and 380Nm. Even the smallest battery version produces 228bhp, with torque unchanged. The Kia, in comparison, is significantly less powerful – the larger battery version makes 169bhp and 255Nm, while the smaller one produces 133bhp with the same torque. The Kia is front-wheel drive; the XEV 9S is rear-wheel drive.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra-XEV-9S-Front-Three-Quarter-1770705784466.webp" alt="Mahindra XEV 9S-Front-Three-Quarter.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Suspension hardware also favours the Mahindra. It offers frequency-dependent dampers or semi-active suspension on higher variants, along with a multi-link independent rear suspension. The Clavis EV sticks to a more conventional non-adjustable setup and gets a torsion beam at the rear. On paper, then, the XEV 9S is the superior machine in most departments. However, there’s one critical area where the Kia pulls ahead – wheelbase. The Clavis EV’s 2,780mm wheelbase is 18mm longer than the XEV’s 2,762mm. That small difference makes a surprisingly big impact for third-row passengers.<br></p>







<h2>Third-Row Space &amp; Comfort: Which EV Is More Practical?</h2>

<p>Since third-row usability is a top priority for buyers in this segment, we started right at the back.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-Rear-Seat-Space-1770705804278.webp" alt="Kia Carens Clavis EV-Rear-Seat-Space.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p>

<p>Ingress and egress first. Thanks to its one-touch tumble function and lower floor, getting into the Kia’s third row is quicker and easier than in the Mahindra, which lacks a similarly convenient folding mechanism. The Carens’ third row is genuinely usable for two average-sized adults. There’s decent legroom, acceptable headroom, and the seats are soft and accommodating. It’s not luxurious, but you could sit here for 3–4 hours without feeling the need to take a break. The backrest reclines, making it easier to find a comfortable position. You also get USB-C ports, AC vents, and cupholders. The only downside is the small windows, which make the space feel a bit claustrophobic.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra-XEV-9S-Rear-Seat-Space-1770705951771.webp" alt="Mahindra XEV 9S-Rear-Seat-Space.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>In the Mahindra, the third-row experience is noticeably inferior. The floor is high, so your knees sit uncomfortably elevated. Headroom is tight, and the seat cushioning is much firmer than in the Kia. There are no USB ports either – just a 12V socket. It feels cramped overall. While the Kia’s third row is genuinely usable, the Mahindra’s feels more like an emergency seat, best reserved for kids under 10 – or maybe the family pet.</p>







<p>Ride quality at the back further widens the gap. The XEV’s suspension is overly soft, resulting in constant vertical movement. It feels floaty, never quite settling, and can induce motion sickness.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-Long-Term-Report-February-2026-1770874797965.webp" alt="Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-Long-Term-Report-February-2026.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>In comparison, the Kia’s ride is more balanced. It’s slightly firm, and NVH levels are higher – you hear more wind, tyre, and suspension noise – but at least the occupants don't get tossed around. If third-row comfort is your top priority, the Clavis EV wins this round convincingly.</p><h2>Second-Row Space, Features &amp; Comfort Comparison</h2>

<p>The second-row. This is where the XEV 9S claws back some points.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_2-1771225862829.webp" alt="Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_2.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>It offers more creature comforts – ventilated seats, a wireless phone charger, and electric ‘Boss Mode’ controls to slide and fold the front passenger seat. There’s also slightly more space for the middle passenger, along with a proper headrest.</p><p>The Clavis EV’s second row is a bit narrower, but in terms of comfort, it’s just as good, if not better. The seats are softer and feel more supportive. You don’t get ventilation, but there are USB ports, a storage tray behind the front passenger seat, and a V2L charging socket – something the Mahindra misses.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_3-1771225883076.webp" alt="Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_3.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>However, the air purifier mounted behind the driver’s seat reduces knee room for the passenger behind, and its hard plastic housing rubbing against your knees can be uncomfortable on longer drives.</p>







<p>In terms of cabin fit and finish, both vehicles are evenly matched. Each features a generous use of soft-touch materials and high-quality plastic panels.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra-XEV-9S-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation-1770705924550.webp" alt="Mahindra XEV 9S-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p> However, the gloss-black finish on the Mahindra’s steering wheel looks and feels a bit tacky compared to the Kia’s squircle steering.</p>

<h2>Driving Experience, Performance &amp; Ride Quality Tested</h2>

<p>Our test cars were top-spec versions, so the XEV 9S naturally had the performance edge. As expected, the Mahindra is quicker in a straight line, though the acceleration isn’t as dramatic as the numbers suggest.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2025/12/Mahindra_XEV_9S_Review_Left_Side_Front_Left_Quarter_Dynamic_autoX.jpg-1765772227746.webp" alt="Mahindra_XEV_9S_Review_Left_Side_Front_Left_Quarter_Dynamic_autoX.jpg.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>It did 0–100km/h in 7 seconds flat (GPS-verified), but the power delivery is smooth and progressive – appropriate for its target audience.</p>

<p>Handling, however, is a mixed bag. The steering feels artificial in all modes. And even with its semi-adaptive suspension in the firmer ‘Race’ mode, the rear end still feels a bit floaty. It’s a decent handler, but not particularly engaging or confidence-inspiring when pushed, largely due to its weight and soft setup.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/01/Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-Long-Term-Report-January-2026-1768902732239.webp" alt="Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-Long-Term-Report-January-2026.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p>

<p>The Clavis, being lighter and lower, feels more car-like from behind the wheel. It’s not exciting, but it’s easy, predictable, and comfortable. Despite having roughly 100bhp less than the Mahindra, it was only 1 second slower to 100km/h, taking 8 seconds.</p>

<p>The steering is lifeless, though, and even in its sportiest setting, it doesn’t weigh up much. There’s noticeable body roll and some chassis flex in faster corners, but drive it sensibly – like a responsible family chauffeur – and it feels perfectly adequate.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_4-1771225906331.webp" alt="Mahindra_XEV_9S_vs_Kia_Carens_Clavis_EV_autoX_Comparison_Review_4.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p>

<p>One area of concern is braking from high speeds. The rear can feel a bit unsettled during emergency stops. The Mahindra, in comparison, feels more planted and confidence-inspiring under hard braking, even though both cars run disc brakes all around.</p>

<p>As for range, the XEV’s larger battery pack delivers a higher real-world figure. In our tests, it managed around 450-460km on a full charge in mixed driving conditions, compared to the Clavis EV’s 350–360km. If you do long-distance driving, the Mahindra will bring you more peace of mind.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra-XEV-9S-Space-1770705967263.webp" alt="Mahindra XEV 9S-Space.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>And in case you’re travelling for a few days, the Mahindra offers more space for your luggage, thanks to its large 150-litre capacity frunk (vs 25-litre in the Kia) on top of its boot space. That said, the Kia’s boot is slightly larger than the Mahindra’s.</p>

<h2>Features, ADAS &amp; In-Car Technology Compared</h2>

<p>The XEV 9S’ main USP is that it packs new technology and a bucketload of features as compared to the Clavis EV. Make no mistake, the Kia is decently kitted out, too – dual 12.3-inch screens, ventilated seats, Level 2 ADAS, and a lot more.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/01/Mahindra-XUV-9S-Adaptive-Cruise-ADAS-1768389944320.webp" alt="Mahindra XUV 9S Adaptive Cruise ADAS.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>But the XEV one-ups it with three displays, a stunning VR-augmented head-up display, Level 2+ ADAS – winner of our Mega ADAS Test 3.0 – and a lot more gizmos. If you’re nerdy like that, the Mahindra offers way more feel-good equipment compared to the Kia. However, if you prefer a relatively less-cluttered space, the Clavis EV is a better choice.</p>

<h2>Final Verdict: Which Three-Row Electric Family Car Wins?</h2>

<p>As it turns out, the Carens Clavis EV is the better of the two three-row electric family cars. If your top priority is space and comfort for all seven occupants, this is a no-brainer.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Mahindra-XEV-9S-vs-Kia-Carens-Clavis-EV-2-1770706000196.webp" alt="Mahindra XEV 9S vs Kia Carens Clavis EV-2.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>However, if you want to tick the third-row option on the checklist, and do not necessarily need it, the XEV 9S delivers more visual drama, stronger performance, longer range, and a more extensive feature list. In the end, it all comes down to who you allow to take the final call – your head or your heart.
</p>





<p>[tabs]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Kia Carens Clavis EV</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> Single Motor FWD</p>

<p><strong>Battery:</strong> 51.4kWh</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 169bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 255Nm</p>

<p><strong>Range:</strong> 490km (MIDC)</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 24.49 lakh, ex-showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>A no-nonsense three-row EV that delivers exactly what it promises.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Spacious, comfy, drives well</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Missing features, high NVH, real-world range</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Mahindra XEV 9S</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> Single Motor RWD</p>

<p><strong>Battery:</strong> 79kWh</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 282bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 380Nm</p>

<p><strong>Range:</strong> 679km (MIDC)</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 29.45 lakh, ex-showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>Want a fully-loaded three-row electric SUV under 30 lakh? This is your only option!</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Feature-packed, it’s an SUV!</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Bouncy ride, heavy, cramped third-row</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[/tabs]</p>

Mahindra XEV 9S or Kia Carens Clavis EV? Which is the better three-row electric family car under ₹30 lakh in India today?

<p>Buying a twin-cylinder motorcycle in India has finally moved beyond the realm of wishful thinking, even though the recent GST reshuffle tried its best to spoil the party. There are numerous tempting options available in the market now, many of which are relatively affordable. However, if you are looking for your first middleweight twin, you need to give the matter some extra thought. After all, it’s not a decision to rush – get it wrong, and your dream of owning a cool machine can quickly turn sour. </p>
<p>

    Two motorcycles sit squarely in this space, and interestingly, both machines are shaped by fundamentally different approaches to the art of motorcycling. In one corner, we have the fresh face of the Aprilia Tuono 457, the road-biased sibling of the RS 457. Not only is it fast, but it’s also tech-laden. In the other corner, we have the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 – a long-established player in the segment. It might not offer the same amount of technology, but it is much lighter on the pocket and packs an extremely competent engine. So, the question is – which way should you lean: the tech-bro or the bare-knuckle boxer?
</p>
<h2>
    Engine Performance &amp; Character: Aprilia Tuono 457 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
</h2>
<p>While their engine displacements differ clearly, the power outputs of both machines are nearly identical. Yes, the Continental GT produces significantly more torque, but it is also much heavier (more on that later). On the move, both machines offer plenty of grunt and can get off the line with a similar sense of urgency. Also, both are almost equally fun to ride.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Aprilia-Tuono-457-Royal-Enfield-Continental-GT-650-1-1770702589490.webp" alt="Aprilia Tuono 457-Royal Enfield Continental GT 650-1.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>

<p>That said, the Tuono 457 is surprisingly more tractable of the two, meaning fewer gear shifts in city riding. The lighter clutch of the Tuono 457 further reinforces this advantage, reducing fatigue in start-stop traffic and making daily commuting more comfortable.
</p>
<p>
    The engine soundtrack, just like design, is subjective, but it’s a crucial consideration in this segment. Once again, both bikes have a 270-degree crank, but they have different soundtracks. The Continental GT’s sound features a solid low-end and is accentuated by a few higher frequencies that Royal Enfield riders will instantly recognise. While I definitely like the Continental GT’s exhaust note, my heart beats a little faster when I hear the raw and guttural roar of the Tuono 457’s.
</p>
<h2>
    Engine Heat Management in Traffic: Tuono 457 vs Continental GT 650
</h2>
<p>Larger-capacity engines tend to produce more heat, which can be especially problematic in traffic. Having experienced the 650cc parallel-twin in various RE motorcycles, I must say that heat management isn’t exactly its strong suit. And given the unforgiving nature of Indian summers, it’s something to be wary of.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Aprilia-Tuono-457-Engine-Close-Up-1770702623321.webp" alt="Aprilia Tuono 457-Engine-Close-Up.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>

<p>Initially, I was of the impression that the Tuono would win this battle, but that’s not exactly the case. Its smaller displacement liquid-cooled engine should have fared better than the Continental GT’s air- and oil-cooled engine. </p>
<p>

    However, that did not happen. The Tuono, too, gets a bit too hot when you are stuck in traffic for long durations. So, there is no real winner here. That said, the Continental GT’s design places the rider’s leg closer to the engine, making incidental contact with it more likely.
</p>
<h2>
    Weight Comparison &amp; Handling: 175kg vs 214kg
</h2>
<p>Weight can be a real point of concern, especially for those riding a bigger bike for the first time. After all, the last thing you want is a bike that’s too heavy for you to handle. At 214kgs, the Continental GT is undeniably hefty, and you can feel all that weight. The Tuono 457, on the other hand, weighs much less – 175kgs to be precise. Consequently, it feels noticeably easier to manoeuvre, especially at parking speeds and in tight spaces.
</p>
<h2>
    Riding Position, Seat Height &amp; Comfort Differences
</h2>
<p>In terms of ergonomics, the Tuono 457 offers a more relaxed riding position than the RS 457. The tube-type handlebars sit higher and are wider, resulting in a more upright posture.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Royal_Enfield_GT_650_Riding_Posture_autoX_Comparison_Aprilia_Tuono_457-1770877289353.webp" alt="Royal_Enfield_GT_650_Riding_Posture_autoX_Comparison_Aprilia_Tuono_457.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>
<p>That said, the rear-set footpegs still require you to lean slightly forward. With a seat height of 800mm – 20mm lower than that of the Continental GT – the Tuono should, in theory, feel more accessible. Still, in practice, I found it more difficult to mount and dismount because of the higher pillion seat.</p>
<p>

    The Continental GT comes with clip-ons, placing the rider in a more aggressive position, albeit not to an extreme degree.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Aprilia_Tuono_457_Riding_Posture_autoX_Comparison_Royal_Enfield_GT_650-1770877483892.webp" alt="Aprilia_Tuono_457_Riding_Posture_autoX_Comparison_Royal_Enfield_GT_650.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>
<p>The real distinction between the two lies in seat design. While both bikes have relatively firm cushioning, the Continental GT’s flatter seat does not push you towards the tank like the Tuono 457’s slanted seat.
</p>
<p>
    In terms of suspension, the Tuono 457 feels stiffer than the Continental GT. The twin rear springs of the Continental GT do a better job of absorbing road imperfections. This, combined with relaxed ergonomics, makes the Continental GT feel more comfortable to ride in the city.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Aprilia-Tuono-457-Royal-Enfield-Continental-GT-650-2-1770702579689.webp" alt="Aprilia Tuono 457-Royal Enfield Continental GT 650-2.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>
<p>The Tuono 457, however, comes with pre-load adjustable front and rear suspension, offering greater versatility. This makes the Tuono better suited to track use and inspires greater confidence when riding hard through twisty roads.
</p>
<h2>
    Instrument Cluster, TFT Display &amp; Electronic Features Compared
</h2>
<p>The Tuono 457 has an edge in this department, for it comes with a 5-inch coloured TFT instrument cluster. The Continental GT, on the other hand, features two analogue dials and a small, monochrome LCD display.</p>
<p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Aprilia_Tuono_457_autoX_Comparison_Royal_Enfield_GT_650_Instrument_Cluster-1770891995240.webp" alt="Aprilia_Tuono_457_autoX_Comparison_Royal_Enfield_GT_650_Instrument_Cluster.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p>
<p>While the aesthetics of the analogue dials have a certain visual charm, the Tuono’s modern interface offers far more information. The screen is crisp, easy to read at a glance, and supported by a well-designed, intuitive UI. In fact, it’s one of the better displays in the segment. </p>
<p>

    In terms of electronic safety features, the Continental GT adopts a minimalist approach. Apart from dual-channel ABS, there is little in the way of electronic assistance. The Tuono, on the other hand, benefits from a ride-by-wire system, three riding modes, traction control modes, and the option to disable the traction control and rear ABS. All this not only enhances rider engagement but also makes the Tuono a more reassuring choice for beginners.
</p>
<h2>
    After-Sales Service &amp; Ownership Experience in India
</h2>
<p>When it comes to the buying experience, Royal Enfield clearly has an advantage in India – you are far more likely to stumble across an RE showroom than an Aprilia showroom. The Italian company’s presence is not as widespread. So, even when it comes to servicing and part availability, the Continental will be easier to live with over the long term.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Royal-Enfield-Continental-GT-650-Motion-1770702456864.webp" alt="Royal Enfield Continental GT 650-Motion.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>

<p>Also, I have come across reports from some Aprilia customers who were dissatisfied with their service experience. That said, Royal Enfield bikes are not immune to mechanical issues either. So, while troubleshooting might be tricky for both bikes, the fact that there are more RE showrooms and bikes on the road tilts the balance in favour of the Continental GT.
</p>
<h2>
    Price Comparison &amp; Final Verdict: Which Twin Should You Buy?
</h2>
<p>Finally, there is the matter of price. The Continental GT starts at Rs 3.50 lakh (ex-showroom), and even with the better-equipped variant featuring LED lighting and alloy wheels, it will cost Rs 3.71 lakh (ex-showroom). The Tuono, by comparison, commands a premium of about Rs 50,000 over the base Continental – a sizable difference in the segment.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Royal-Enfield-Continental-GT-650-Headlight-1770702447921.webp" alt="Royal Enfield Continental GT 650-Headlight.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>

<p>For those who want a big-displacement engine at a relatively accessible price point, the Continental makes a lot of sense. It may lack modern, fancy features, but this does little to detract from the riding experience. It is also perfect for enthusiasts who prefer bikes with fewer electronic interventions. What’s more, even with its price out of the equation, the Continental is still an appealing proposition, thanks to its ergonomics, a timeless, proven engine, and fantastic styling.</p>
<div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
    <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Aprilia-Tuono-457-Motion-1770702602480.webp" alt="Aprilia Tuono 457-Motion.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>

<p>The Tuono 457, while more expensive, offers additional features that justify its premium price. Its preload-adjustable suspension makes it a motorcycle you can grow with, adapting as your skills improve. It can also switch from road to track mode in the blink of an eye. The lighter weight, nimbler handling, and loads of raw power make it a super fun bike to ride. If I were in the market for my first twin-cylinder motorcycle, I would definitely pick the Tuono, although I would almost certainly replace that annoying seat with something a bit more comfortable for daily use.</p>
<iframe width="1425" height="500" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/K0JEs4PZ6AI" title="Tuono 457 vs Continental GT: Performance, Comfort &amp; Value Compared | autoX" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
<p>[tabs]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Royal Enfield Continental GT 650</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 649cc, Parallel-Twin</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 6-Speed</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 46.8bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong>&nbsp;52.3Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong>&nbsp;Petrol</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 3.82 lakh, ex-showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>Still an attention grabber and a&nbsp;genuine style statement.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Attractive price,
                    charming design</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Tyre grip, weight</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Aprilia Tuono 457</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 457cc, Parallel-Twin</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 6-Speed</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 47bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong>&nbsp;43.5Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong>&nbsp;Petrol</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 4.01 lakh, ex-showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>A bike that
        feels equally at home on
        the road and the track.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Lightweight, feature-packed, tractable engine</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Uncomfortable seating</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[/tabs]</p>

Aprilia Tuono 457 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 – Twin-Cylinder Showdown

Two very different takes on the twin-cylinder formula. One chases tech and agility, the other banks on character and heritage — which wins?

<p>
    The Punch has been a strong performer for Tata Motors. This sub-compact SUV topped the sales charts in 2024, dethroning the long-reigning titans from Maruti Suzuki. Since then, however, sales figures for the Punch have dropped, prompting Tata to respond with a facelift. And that is how we got the new Punch. Crucially, it now comes with a more powerful engine option. The question, then, is simple: has Tata finally turned the Punch into a truly formidable performer?</p>

<h2>2026 Tata Punch Facelift Design and Interior Updates</h2>

<p>In typical facelift fashion, the Punch’s exterior has not changed dramatically but has been subtly tweaked. The grille between the DRLs is slimmer, and the LED headlamp clusters are more compact.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/01/Tata-Punch-Facelift-(3)-1768297849232.webp" alt="Tata Punch Facelift (3).jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Together, these changes give the front end a more EV-like appearance. Smarter-looking 16-inch alloys enhance the side profile, and I am glad Tata has retained the high-mounted rear door handles, as they preserve the Punch’s distinctive character.</p>
<p>Like almost every new car today, the Punch now features connected taillamps. While the light bar looks contemporary and smart, it also robs the car of some of the individuality that defined the older design.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Tata-Punch-Rear-View-1770701145623.webp" alt="Tata Punch-Rear-View.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Overall, the Punch still comes across as a smart and well-proportioned SUV, even if the rear now looks more generic.</p>







<p>The most noticeable visual change in the cabin is the new dual-tone seat upholstery, which lends the cabin a more spacious feel. The dashboard has a clean, uncluttered layout, and the seats now have improved under-thigh support – a genuinely welcome addition. The new two-spoke, illuminated steering wheel, also seen in other Tata models, looks futuristic, but has a glossy black finish in the middle that is a fingerprint magnet.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Tata-Punch-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation-1770701163497.webp" alt="Tata Punch-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The same finish appears on the panel housing the new touch-based AC controls. Another new addition to this facelift is the 360-degree camera. The quality of the feed is average at best, but that’s not a big issue, given the segment the Punch sits in. I have mixed feelings about the 7-inch digital MID, too. While it displays a wealth of information, the user interface feels underdeveloped and somewhat amateurish.</p>
<p>The space in the second row remains largely unchanged. However, rear-seat passengers now benefit from the added under-thigh support, and Tata has finally included a three-point seatbelt for the middle occupant.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Tata-Punch-front-seat-1770701173864.webp" alt="Tata Punch-front-seat.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Unfortunately, there is no rear-seat load sensor, so you have to keep the seatbelts fastened even when no one is sitting there, or the warning chime will kick in.</p>







<h2>2026 Tata Punch Turbo and CNG-AMT Performance Review</h2>

<p>I had the opportunity to sample both the new 1.2-litre turbo-petrol engine and the CNG variant paired with the new AMT gearbox. The turbo-petrol engine left me genuinely impressed by just how potent it is. It accelerates with far greater urgency, cruises more comfortably at highway speeds, and makes overtaking significantly easier.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Tata-Punch-Engine-1770701153079.webp" alt="Tata Punch-Engine.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Combined with the Punch’s inherently good ride quality and responsive dynamics, the added performance makes it far more enjoyable to drive. Yes, the manual gearbox is slightly notchy, and the clutch lacks progressive feel; however, when driving enthusiastically, these things simply fade into the background. However, the engine is gruff and noticeably noisy.</p>
<p>The CNG-AMT combination is far more relaxed and noticeably slower. In CNG mode, acceleration is gentle to begin with, and the AMT takes its own sweet time to shift gears.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Tata-Punch-gear-lever-1770701182792.webp" alt="Tata Punch-gear-lever.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>This configuration is clearly designed for convenience rather than outright performance. To that end, I do see the appeal of the CNG-AMT version of the Punch – it offers excellent fuel efficiency and the ease of an automatic.</p>









<h2>2026 Tata Punch Facelift Verdict: Is It Worth Buying?</h2>

<p>It is fair to say that, barring the addition of the new turbo-petrol engine, most of the changes to the Punch are incremental. The turbo motor undoubtedly adds a new layer of excitement, but the overall experience would have been better if Tata had also addressed refinement. The introduction of an AMT with the CNG variant, however, is a smart move, significantly broadening the Punch’s appeal and giving buyers a more appealing choice. The Punch’s biggest trump card remains its aggressive pricing. Many of its shortcomings are easier to overlook when you consider how competitively priced it is. So, while the updated Punch is not a radical departure from its predecessor, it continues to make a compelling case for itself in the sub-Rs 10 lakh segment.</p><iframe width="1425" height="500" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cbuVj1n2e6w" title="2026 Tata Punch Facelift: Owner’s Perspective | autoX" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>




<p>[tabs]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Tata Punch iTurbo</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 1,199cc 3-Cylinder</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 6-Speed MT FWD</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 118bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 170Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong> Petrol</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 9.99 lakh, ex-showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>A pocket-friendly SUV with plenty of features and flexibility.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Powerful turbo engine, ride quality, smart design</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Clutch calibration, rear seat space</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Tata Punch iCNG</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 1,199cc 3-Cylinder</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 5-Speed AMT FWD</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 86.5/72.3bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 115/103Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong> Petrol/CNG</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 10.54 lakh, ex-showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>A pocket-friendly SUV with plenty of features and flexibility.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Powerful turbo engine, ride quality, smart design</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Clutch calibration, rear seat space</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[/tabs]</p>

2026 Tata Punch Facelift First Drive Review – Counter Punch

The Punch is back in the ring with renewed bravado and a stronger arsenal, but can it finally deliver the knockout blow?

<p>
    The compact SUV has become the default choice for Indian buyers seeking the SUV form without the inconvenience that comes with owning one. As a result, the segment has not only expanded rapidly but also diversified dramatically. Carmakers now recognise that merely ticking feature boxes is no longer sufficient and that it’s essential for a product to have a distinct character to stand out. Consider the Kia Syros, for instance, which is engineered with a clear focus on space and comfort. Contrast that with the Skoda Kylaq, which prioritises driving engagement to such an extent that we previously included it in our hot hatch comparison. And then there is the updated Hyundai Venue, which enters the fray with added features and improved cabin space.</p><p>So, while all three occupy the same segment, they pursue mass appeal through very different approaches. The question, then, is simple: which one best suits your needs and is the better overall product? Let’s find out.</p>







<h2>Venue vs Kylaq vs Syros Design &amp; Road Presence</h2>

<p>Design is a matter of subjective preference, and these SUVs are no exception. Personally, I really like the clean, futuristic, and bold design of the Syros.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Kia-Syros-Front-Three-Quarter-1770699998731.webp" alt="Kia Syros-Front-Three-Quarter.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>It is my favourite of the lot. The closed-off grille and the boxy proportions help it stand out from the crowd. Yes, from certain angles, it looks more like a tallboy than an SUV, but that is the only criticism I have. That said, I am well aware that many people dislike its styling. In fact, some openly despise it.</p><p>The Venue and the Kylaq, on the other hand, look far more like conventional SUVs.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-Skoda-Kylaq-1770699819138.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-Skoda Kylaq.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>As a result, most buyers are likely to gravitate toward one of these two options for exterior design. Hyundai recently updated the Venue with a new front fascia and rear section, making it look more imposing. I still dislike the gaping maw created by the front grille, but the new boxy stance brings it closer to the traditional SUV silhouette. However, between the Venue and the Kylaq, I prefer the latter. The Kylaq has a simpler yet more cohesive face, and its smart 17-inch alloys add significantly to its visual appeal. Surprisingly, the Venue is the only SUV of the three to get 16-inch alloys, and those, too, are rather plain.</p>











<h2>Venue vs Kylaq vs Syros Interior Design, Features &amp; Cabin Experience Compared</h2>

<p>The Kylaq has a well-put-together interior, and the dashboard looks good, too. However, the extensive use of hard plastic surfaces does knock it down a notch compared to its rivals.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Skoda-Kylaq-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation-1770699839201.webp" alt="Skoda Kylaq-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>It also features an almost all-black cabin, which, while sporty in appearance, can feel slightly claustrophobic compared with the brighter interiors of the Venue and Syros. The Venue, with its updated dashboard, offers the brightest ambience of the three. I particularly like the new white inlay running across the middle of the dashboard and onto the door panels.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation-1770699645562.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>That said, I would not call it the most cohesive design overall. In my view, the Syros strikes the best balance, combining an airy feel with the most coherent and thoughtfully executed cabin design.</p><p>In terms of features, all three support wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. However, the Kylaq lags behind because this feature is not standard and is reserved for higher trims. Both the Syros and Venue offer it as standard across the range.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-infotainment-screen-1770699669413.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-infotainment-screen.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Screen size is another area where the Kylaq trails with a 10-inch touchscreen, while the Syros and Venue both get larger 12.3-inch displays. Thankfully, all three systems are comparable in terms of touch response and overall functionality. The same applies to the instrument clusters. The Syros and Venue feature 12.3-inch digital units, whereas the Kylaq uses a smaller 7-inch display. Once again, functionality remains broadly similar across all three.</p><p>The Syros also gets an additional 5-inch screen positioned between the touchscreen and instrument cluster for climate control.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Kia-Syros-infotainment-screen-1770699974243.webp" alt="Kia Syros-infotainment-screen.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Now, I have always found screen-based AC controls cumbersome to use on the move, but thankfully, Kia has sensibly retained physical buttons for adjusting temperature and blower speed.</p>













<p>All three SUVs offer ventilated front seats, but the Syros goes a step further by providing ventilation for the second row seat base as well. It also includes the small but genuinely useful feature of one-touch operation for all four windows. Another point of differentiation is the sunroof: the Korean duo offer large panoramic units, while the Kylaq has a considerably smaller one.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Skoda-Kylaq-Rear-Seat-Space-1770699882294.webp" alt="Skoda Kylaq-Rear-Seat-Space.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Seat cushioning and overall comfort are commendable in all three, but I particularly like the bolstering on the Kylaq’s seats. They do the best job of ensuring comfort for occupants on longer journeys.</p>





<h2>Venue vs Kylaq vs Syros Rear Seat Space, Practicality &amp; Boot Capacity</h2>

<p>When it comes to the second-row experience, the Syros is comfortably the best of the lot. The space on offer is generous, the bench is supportive, and there are a few unique features. It is the only car on the list to offer an adjustable rear bench.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2025/05/1746786665315-xmrb-Sia-Syros-Front-Rear-Seat.webp" alt="Sia-Syros-Front-Rear-Seat.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Not only can you vary the recline angle, but you can also slide the seat to increase the legroom. At six feet tall, I could sit with ample knee room, even without sliding the rear bench fully back, while the front seats were adjusted to my preference.</p>

<p>The Venue comes close in terms of outright space, while the Kylaq is clearly the most cramped. This is surprising when you consider the spec sheets, as the Kylaq actually has the longest wheelbase of the three, at 2,566 mm.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-Rear-Seat-Space-1770699692107.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-Rear-Seat-Space.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The Syros and Venue measure 2,550mm and 2,520mm, respectively. That said, the Kylaq’s rear seat is not completely unusable. It can comfortably accommodate two adults for shorter commutes.</p><p>The sliding rear bench in the Syros also helps expand boot space, bringing the maximum luggage capacity to 465 litres.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/KIa_Syros_Bootspace_vs_Venue_vs_Kylaq_autoX-1770718306537.webp" alt="KIa_Syros_Bootspace_vs_Venue_vs_Kylaq_autoX.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The Venue and Kylaq offer similar boot volumes, with the Kylaq once again trailing the pack. This suggests that Skoda has, perhaps, not made the most efficient use of the available space, given that the Kylaq has the longest wheelbase.</p>







<h2>Venue vs Kylaq vs Syros Engine Options, Performance &amp; Driving Modes</h2>

<p>All three SUVs are offered with a 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine, with the units in the Venue and Syros being identical. As a result, their output figures are also the same.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Skoda-Kylaq-Engine-Close-Up-1770699870852.webp" alt="Skoda Kylaq-Engine-Close-Up.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>On paper, the Kylaq offers slightly less power but has a marginally higher torque figure. In real-world driving, all three deliver adequate performance. They have enough punch for quick overtakes and can maintain highway speeds comfortably, even with a completely occupied cabin.</p><p>That said, there are clear differences in how this performance is delivered. The Kylaq feels the most eager off the line, largely due to the pronounced surge you feel once the turbo kicks in.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-vs-Skoda-Kylaq-vs-Kia-Syros-2-1770699633070.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue vs Skoda Kylaq vs Kia Syros-2.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The Syros and Venue, on the other hand, offer a more linear, progressive throttle response, which is better suited to urban driving. The presence of multiple drive and traction modes in these two further helps tailor the driving experience to varying conditions.</p>







<p>Where the Kylaq clearly falls behind is in powertrain choice. Both the Venue and Syros are also available with a frugal yet punchy 1.5-litre diesel engine, while the Venue also offers a 1.2-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine. This breadth of options makes the Venue the most versatile.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-Engine-Close-Up-1770699681979.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-Engine-Close-Up.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>In fact, we tested the all-new (for the Venue) diesel-automatic variant in this comparison. The diesel motor is punchy, and the automatic gearbox is adequate for most driving conditions. The diesel motor also returns roughly 30-40% more mileage compared to the turbo-petrol. However, once you start pushing the Venue, you notice that the gearbox struggles to keep up. Another downside is the comparatively loud engine noise that seeps into the cabin.</p><p>It’s also worth noting that the higher trims of the Syros and Venue are equipped with Level 2 ADAS, which offers up to 16 autonomous safety features. The Kylaq, on the other hand, does not come with ADAS features. While not everyone values ADAS, having the option is undoubtedly beneficial.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2025/11/Venue_05-1762766737840.webp" alt="Venue_05.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>More importantly, both the Syros and Venue come with a surround-view camera system, but the Kylaq misses out. Even its rear-view camera lags behind in terms of resolution and overall image quality.</p>







<h2>Venue vs Kylaq vs Syros Ride Comfort, Handling &amp; Steering Feel</h2>

<p>When it comes to suspension tuning, the Venue is the most softly sprung of the lot. Both drivers and passengers will appreciate its ability to absorb rough city roads. However, this soft setup also makes it feel slightly bouncy at highway speeds, with noticeable body roll around sharper corners.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-side-profile-dynamic-1770699656640.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-side-profile-dynamic.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The light and rather lifeless steering only exacerbates the issue when driving enthusiastically. On the plus side, that same light steering makes the Venue easy to manoeuvre in traffic and effortless to park.</p><p>The Syros, by comparison, feels the stiffest, though it still delivers acceptable ride comfort.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2025/06/Kia-Syros-Long-Term-Report-June-2025-1749620940320.webp" alt="Kia-Syros-Long-Term-Report-June-2025.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>You can push it harder than the Venue without feeling unsettled, and the steering has more heft and accuracy, which further enhances the overall experience.&nbsp; <br></p>





<p>However, it is the Kylaq that stands out for its driving experience. It manages to combine a plush ride over most road imperfections with excellent body control through fast corners. While its absorption is not quite as plush as the Venue’s, it is noticeably better than the Syros’.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Skoda-Kylaq-side-profile-dynamic-1770699829203.webp" alt="Skoda Kylaq-side-profile-dynamic.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The steering is the most precise of the lot, and its size and shape feel spot-on. Overall, it strikes the best balance between passenger comfort and driver engagement. This is where the Kylaq’s European engineering truly shines.</p>

<h2>Verdict: Which Compact SUV Makes the Most Sense?</h2>

<p>Each SUV here targets a distinct type of buyer. They excel in different areas, and each makes a compelling case for themselves.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Hyundai-Venue-vs-Skoda-Kylaq-vs-Kia-Syros-3-1770700019113.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue vs Skoda Kylaq vs Kia Syros-3.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>That said, the Syros emerges as the strongest all-rounder. It offers the most space, excellent comfort, and a satisfying driving experience. Its only real drawback is the polarising exterior design. Of the three, the Syros comes closest to being a true Jack of all trades.</p><p>If you can live with slightly compromised rear-seat space and have no interest in a diesel, the Kylaq is the next best choice. It delivers the highest level of driver engagement at a very attractive price point, making it the enthusiast’s pick of the trio. For younger buyers and those just starting a family, the Kylaq offers driving thrills unmatched in this segment.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2025/12/Hyundai-Venue-Front-1765435732621.webp" alt="Hyundai Venue-Front.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p>





<p>The Venue sits somewhere between the Kylaq and the Syros. It does not encourage spirited driving, but its light steering and softly sprung suspension make it exceptionally easy to live with in urban environments. Space and features are both competitive, and it also benefits from the strongest brand value of the three, lending it added street credibility. Combined with the widest range of powertrain options, the Venue remains a sensible and well-rounded choice. It is not a weak contender by any measure; it simply has the misfortune of competing in a fiercely competitive segment</p><iframe width="1425" height="500" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bO4zvAK6OEg" title="Kylaq vs Venue vs Syros - Driving Fun vs Smart Tech | autoX Comparison" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>




<p>[tabs]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Hyundai Venue</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 1,493cc 4-Cylinder</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 6-Speed AT FWD</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 113.9bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 250Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong> Diesel</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 15.69 lakh Ex showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>The SUV that combines space, features and brand power in a single package.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Absorbent ride, powertrain variety</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Lifeless steering</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Skoda Kylaq</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 999cc, 3-Cylinder</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 6-Speed AT FWD</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 114bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 178Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong> Petrol</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 12.99 lakh Ex showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>The most fun to drive SUV in the segment.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Smart design, sporty handling</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Space, cabin plastics</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Kia Syros</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 998cc, 3-Cylinder</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 7-Speed DCT FWD</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 118.4bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 172Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong> Petrol</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong>&nbsp;Rs 15.29 lakh Ex showroom</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>The most complete family offering in the sub-4m space.</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Spacious cabin, flexible boot space</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Polarising design</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[/tabs]</p>

Hyundai Venue vs Skoda Kylaq vs Kia Syros - Three of a Kind

They share a segment but not a philosophy. Space, features and driving feel set these compact SUVs apart – we tell you which suits you best.

<p>
    The upper middle class is a bit like the middle child of the modern world. Too "poor" for business class, yet not ordinary enough to fly economy. Can afford a penthouse, but can’t quite gather the gumption to buy an independent villa. Permanently stuck in the neither-here-nor-there zone.</p>





<p>Car buying isn’t any easier for this lot. This buyer doesn’t want your usual Cretas, Seltos, or XUVs. But splurging a fortune on a full-blown German luxury barge? That feels excessive. And they’re far too savvy to be swayed by entry-level Audi, BMW, or Merc luxury cars – because those often feel like badge-first, product-second propositions.</p><p>So, for anyone shopping in the ₹35–60 lakh bracket, the options – across body styles – are surprisingly slim. Strip EVs out of the equation, and Toyota practically has a monopoly. Sedan? Camry. That’s it. MPV? Innova Hycross, unchallenged. SUV? The Fortuner still rules the roost.</p>

<p>Few carmakers have dared to take on Toyota here. But now, the Germans are finally showing signs of resistance. Skoda brought back the Kodiaq in 2025, and Volkswagen has entered the ring with the new Tayron R-Line.</p><div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Side-Profile-1770354383653.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Side-Profile.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    <p>Think of it as a Kodiaq in a VW suit. Or, more accurately, an XL version of the Tiguan R-Line. But this isn’t just badge engineering. VW India is betting big on it. Unlike the CBU-only Tiguan R-Line, the Tayron will be locally assembled. It also packs more features than the Kodiaq. There’s a reason VW is calling it their new flagship, you know…</p>











<h2>Volkswagen Tayron R-Line&nbsp;Exterior Design</h2>

<p>If the Tayron looks familiar, that’s because it is. Its design closely mirrors the Tiguan R-Line – sleek, sporty, and understated. It doesn’t scream for attention, but it has presence.
      
     R-Line touches like the bold grille, strong proportions, and 19-inch alloys give it a clean yet commanding stance.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Front-1770354756241.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Front.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The illuminated VW logo and light bar at the front and rear add some visual drama – arguably, the only slightly flashy bits in an otherwise subtle design. The real difference from the Tiguan lies in the size. Because of the additional row of seats, the wheelbase has stretched to 2,789mm – 109mm longer than the Tiguan.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Side-Profile-2-1770354290333.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Side-Profile-2.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>At 4,792mm, the Tayron is a substantial 253mm longer overall. In profile, it looks noticeably bigger, with long overhangs that make it appear more estate-like than SUV-ish.</p>







<h2>Volkswagen Tayron R-Line Interior &amp; Features</h2>

<p>Inside, it’s classic Volkswagen. Doors shut with a reassuring thud, materials feel solid, and ergonomics are spot-on. The dashboard is dominated by a 15-inch touchscreen infotainment system that’s crisp, responsive, and easy to navigate.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation-1770354409424.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-View-Of-Steering-Console-And-Instrumentation.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>What’s less impressive is the heavy reliance on touch controls for most functions – not the most intuitive setup on the move. The all-black theme feels premium but also makes the cabin feel a bit closed in.</p><p>In terms of creature comforts, VW has clearly learned from the Tiguan R-Line’s shortcomings and has loaded the Tayron to the gills. </p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/Volkswagen_Tayron_Review_autoX_Front_Seats-1770361792478.webp" alt="Volkswagen_Tayron_Review_autoX_Front_Seats.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Heated, and ventilated front seats with massage function, heated steering wheel, 12-way electric front seats with memory function for the driver, large panoramic sunroof, Level 2 ADAS, ambient lighting, extendable under-thigh support for front seats, 3-zone climate control, gesture-controlled tailgate, 700W Harman Kardon sound system, and more are now part of the standard kit.</p>







<h2>Volkswagen Tayron R-Line Comfort and Practicality </h2>

<p>On paper, the Tayron’s headline USP is the third row. In reality, like the old Tiguan AllSpace, this is a 5+2, not a true 7-seater. The third row is tight.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Rear-Seat-Space-1770354443154.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Rear-Seat-Space.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Anyone an inch above 5 ft. will struggle, and the lack of a one-touch tumble function makes accessing the third row hard work. The dark interior doesn’t help either. This set of seats is best reserved for short city runs or kids. The second row, however, is far more accommodating. There’s generous legroom, good under-thigh support, and enough space for adults on long drives.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Power-Window-Switches-1770354397471.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Power-Window-Switches.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>Rear occupants also get the essentials – 3-zone climate control, USB-C ports, and sun-blinds. The tall transmission tunnel will annoy the middle passenger, though.</p>







<h2>Volkswagen Tayron R-Line Engine &amp; Performance</h2>

<p>Under the hood sits the familiar 2.0-litre turbo-petrol producing 201bhp and 320Nm, paired with a 7-speed DSG and AWD.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Engine-1770354503571.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Engine.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>This engine is classic VW – refined, eager, and free-revving. It pulls strongly through the low and mid-range, and when pushed, it races to the redline without strain, accompanied by a raspy induction note. The DSG complements it beautifully with quick, smooth shifts and little gear hunting.</p><p>Performance is brisk. 0–100km/h comes up in 7.3 seconds, and if you keep your right foot planted to the floor, it’ll reach a top speed of 224km/h, provided you find a road long enough.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Front-Three-Quarter-1770354760573.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Front-Three-Quarter.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>The downside? Fuel efficiency. If you see double-digit km/l figures, treat it as a personal achievement. A diesel in this application is sorely missed.</p><p>A big improvement over the Tiguan R-Line is ride quality. The suspension has been retuned for Indian conditions, and it shows. Low-speed ride is far more forgiving, while high-speed composure remains excellent. The Kodiaq still feels a touch more supple, but the Tayron is no longer brittle. The secondary ride can feel slightly choppy over rough patches, though. Where the Tayron really shines is handling.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Rear-Three-Quarter-1770354470889.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Rear-Three-Quarter.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>It feels taut, responsive, and remarkably agile for its size. Body control is excellent, grip levels are high, and it shrinks around you when you start driving enthusiastically. </p><p>VW has managed to retain the Tiguan R-Line’s dynamic character while adding more space and comfort – quite impressive. That said, DCC or adaptive dampers aren’t being offered in India. Not a dealbreaker per se, but would have been nice to get an extra layer of adjustability.</p>













<h2>Volkswagen Tayron R-Line Verdict</h2>

<p>Volkswagen hasn’t announced prices yet, but since it’s locally assembled, expect a sticker of just under Rs 50 lakh (ex-showroom). At that price, its main rivals will be the Kodiaq and the Fortuner. Compared to the Kodiaq, the Tayron feels more modern, gets extra features, and is the more engaging SUV to drive. Against the Fortuner, it loses out on brand image, a diesel engine, and Toyota’s bulletproof reputation.</p><p>
      <div style="width: 100%; height: auto;" class="post-image">
        <img src="https://images.autox.com/uploads/2026/02/VW-Tayron-R-Line-Rear-Static-1770354781474.webp" alt="VW Tayron R-Line-Rear-Static.jpg" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
      </div>
    </p><p>But, on the flip side, it doesn’t drive like a boat or ride like a truck, and doesn’t feel a decade old inside. So, unless you’re planning a future in politics – where a Fortuner is practically a uniform – there’s very little objective reason to pick it over the Tayron. For the upper-middle-class buyer stuck in automotive limbo, the Tayron R-Line might just be the sweet spot.
</p>










<p>[tabs]</p>

<p>[tab title="<strong>Volkswagen Tayron R-Line</strong>"]</p>

<p><strong>Engine:</strong> 1,984cc 4-Cylinder</p>

<p><strong>Transmission:</strong> 7-Speed DCT AWD</p>

<p><strong>Power:</strong> 201bhp</p>

<p><strong>Torque:</strong> 320Nm</p>

<p><strong>Fuel:</strong> Petrol</p>

<p><strong>Price:</strong> TBA</p>

<p><strong>X-Factor:&nbsp;</strong><em>Hatchback-like driving dynamics, sedan-like comfort, and SUV-like practicality. The Tayron R-Line has it all!</em></p>

<table cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Pros &nbsp;</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>
                    •&nbsp; Performance, driving dynamics, feature-packed</p>

            </td>
            <td>
                <p><strong>Cons</strong><br>
                    • Cramped third-row, no diesel engine on offer</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

<p>[/tab]</p>

<p>[/tabs]</p>

Volkswagen Tayron R-Line Review - The Middle Path

Find the Fortuner too crude? Too discerning to fall for the entry-level luxury car trap? The Volkswagen Tayron R-Line, then, is made for you.

Toyota Cars Dealers and Showrooms in Kumbakonam

1 Toyota Car Dealers

Anaamalais Toyota

Toyota Cars Dealers & Showrooms in Metro Cities

Bangalore

Mumbai

New Delhi

Chennai

Lucknow

Explore Dealers & Showrooms of Other Brands

Explore Dealers & Showrooms of Other Brands

Find the Cars of your Choice

Find New Cars

Popular Car Brands

Recent Posts

Videos